JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — The city of Jacksonville approved a $1.4 billion "stadium of the future" Tuesday that should keep the Jaguars in one of the NFL's smallest markets for at least another 30 years and end decades of speculation about the franchise being a potential relocation candidate.
City councilmembers voted 14-1 (two abstained and two more were absent) in favor of the proposal, which now advances to NFL owners for final approval. Owners are scheduled to meet in Atlanta in October, with 24 of 32 votes needed to seal the deal.
"This is a historic day for our city," Jacksonville Mayor Donna Deegan said. "Monumental. It's generational progress."
The Jaguars don't anticipate much pushback from the league even though the 50-50 financial split is higher than most NFL owners contribute toward new or renovated stadiums.
"There's a lot of questions, but we're satisfied that we will be able to effectively answer those questions and look forward to getting this finalized in mid-October," Jaguars president Mark Lamping said.
The stadium proposal calls for each side to contribute $625 million to the $1.25 billion project. Jacksonville, which won't levy any new taxes to fund the rebuild, would chip in another $150 million in deferred maintenance to get EverBank Stadium ready for construction in 2026. That essentially pushes the city's contribution to 55% of the total bill.
Construction would begin following the 2025 season. The Jaguars would play in front of a reduced capacity (no upper deck) in 2026 and then host home games in Gainesville or Orlando the following year.
The proposal includes a 30-year lease, a non-relocation agreement and a provision that limits the number of games the Jaguars can play outside Jacksonville. Under the new lease, the Jaguars would play all preseason and postseason home games in Jacksonville and would continue to play one home game a year in London, likely at Wembley Stadium.
Both sides expect the revamped stadium to lead to more high-profile events.
The Jaguars agreed to take on all construction cost overruns, assume day-to-day operations of the stadium and bear 80.4% of game day expenses moving forward.
The proposed 63,000-seat, open-air stadium includes a translucent covering that's the equivalent of "wearing shades in the sun," Lamping has said. It's expected to lower outside temperatures by 15 degrees.
Capacity could be expanded to 71,500 to accommodate the annual Florida-Georgia rivalry, the Gator Bowl, a College Football Playoff game or the Final Four. Pools and a party deck would remain in the north end zone.
The city and the Jaguars still hope to add substantial development to the surrounding area, which is expected to include a University of Florida satellite campus that would bring in 10,000 graduate students. The city and the team consider the areas surrounding the stadium critical to the long-term success of Jacksonville's downtown.
The city plans to finance its portion of the deal by moving $600 million from a capital improvement plan and using revenue from an existing, half-penny sales tax to fund the build in a pay-as-you-go campaign. The city says it would save $1.5 billion in debt-services fees over the life of the lease.
The Jaguars plan to fund part of its portion through the NFL's G-4 program, which provides financial assistance for stadium projects. Funding through the program is considered a loan and is repaid from the visiting team's share of certain seating. A team applying for the loan is required to put up matching dollars.
The Jaguars first started planning major stadium upgrades in 2016, four years after Shad Khan bought the team.
"The reason we started on it so early is that we studied those cities that had problems with their teams," Lamping said. "Unfortunately there have been cities that have lost their NFL teams and they generally all have the same thing in common: It's a smaller market, the team doesn't have a lease tying them to the city and they have an unresolved stadium problem.
"Shad's commitment from the very beginning was to do everything that we could do ensure that doesn't happen to Jacksonville."
“You threw my son under the bus. You didn't take care of him.”
The State of Florida and the VA are under scrutiny after the Baker Act was used incorrectly on a young veteran who went to a Florida VA hospital for help.
